Please welcome Eyoyo Underwater Fishing Cameras.https://amzn.to/3siEgXn
Recently I had caught up with a manager of a local PFBC fish hatchery,asked him two questions about NEW PICKEREL REGS.IN STATE OF PA #1 Why increase the size to 18 " but keep season open all year long? answer was What Harrisberg says goes some biologist has a plan somewhere. #2 Why are you the fish hatchery guy actually spending fishing licence $ on raising these fish for stocking? answer was Some people really like to fish for PICKEREL. So before this great site shuts down for the season I would like to know your thoughts on these 2 PICKEREL topics. My 2 cents is that I personally do not care for this fish BASS man and panfisher myself.Why raise a predatory fish that competes against the Bass and devours all bait and panfish insight.Trout , Walleye , Perch, no problem in raising these fish for stocking . What do you think ?
Pickerel fry and juveniles are a major source of bass food in many of the shallow weedy pocono lakes such as SHOHOLA, and without the dorsal spines alot easier on the digestive system. Also how many of you have had one of those hot summer days where you can't buy a bite from a bass, you get a topwater explosion from a pickerel, tell me it doesn't get your adrenalin going. And last but not least, how many of you have taken kids ice fishing??? How interesting would it be for them without those toothy critters stealing your minnows and poppin flags all day.
I hate catching Pickerel, although I don't keep anything I catch - everything goes back. Reason for me is Pickerel have a nasty habit of cutting and nicking the flurocarbon leader I use. Sucks having to constantly cut nicked leaders and re-tie hooks. I fish with tip-ups and during the course of a day almost every single time I get a bite it will be a Pickerel.
PCB,all though what you say is true about fish size management.... the second pickerel does not look 6.5 pounds. first one maybe..... I got some big ones through the ice that were that big but i did guess them at any better than 5 pounds or so. OH and about the pickerel size limit being increased. I think that it is the worse thing that the PFBC could do if they (or the public) want quality fish. Almost all the lakes that i fish all have very large numbers of sub-legal pickerel. I would go as far as to say that most lakes in PA are over run with the little hammer handles. You have to weed through about 20 of them every trip to get a good sized pickerel to eat. you can not get anything from a pickerel less than 21 inches. Personaly I dont keep them unless they are 22 or better. all the new regs are going to do is stunt the populations and keep them sub legal and therefore we will have thousands of little eating machines that are going compete for food with other more popular gamefish. just my to cents,JiggerMan
I recently fished with a good friend of mine who's also the W.C.O. for the region I live in, and he pretty much felt the same as the rest of us that raising the length limit wasn't necessarily the answer. We discussed the possibilities of a "slot" limit.....where maybe the majority of the limit could be any fish under 16" with one fish over 16" or maybe designate some waters as 4 pickerel any size....
Trying to read the original post ! Is it just me that can't read? or is the words spelled wrong or something. Anyhow the Pickerel is not a eating machine thats going to eat all the small fish and "BASS". Infact its not true about any of the PIKE family. Now here in the S.C. part of the State > pickerel are not over crowded. I've looked at the stomach content of Muskies here and didn't see BASS,DUCKS,KITTENS,FROGS,and all them rumors. we found only baitfish (-6") and bugs and crawfish. As the above board said > Pickerel are better tasting then trout. Over populated is bad of any type of fish. As too why waste $ on raising pickerel ? Well why waste my$ on "trout". Taking hundreds of trout and dumping them in a creek bend near a road for two weeks till the first day of trout is NOT doing anything but sell fishermen on a licenses as they see the fish holding fast till the big day. You call that fishing? If the fish can't reproduce and its not a Hybrid then why over stock it in a waterway that it will not exist 6 months from now or can't hold that # in that time frame. I support all gamefish right down to FALLFISH. I like a fish that fights and what fish will not at the end of a line.
I understand what JiggerMan is talking about and agree with him. I get frustrated with all the small Pickerel but it just isn't small pickerel. Seems like most fish I catch and see others catching are really small, doesn't matter what the species is, everything is small. I don't fish the big lakes like the Pack where I know guys get good size fish, but the smaller lakes should have something decent size but they don't. I'm 52 yrs old, I can remember as a kid catching some nice size pickerel, bass, walleye, trout etc... now it seems like everything I catch is small, doesn't matter the species. It's not that the fish I caught as a kid just seemed bigger, I have old pictures and can prove what I say. This past ice fishing season I caught a good number of pickerel, bass & walleye from 5 of the lakes I've been fishing since I was a kid (all PFBC owned lakes), I don't think one fish was legal size (I'm trying to think back - it's possible 1 bass was legal). I know I'm not the only one catching small fish. During slow days I'll walk around and talk to other guys, everybody seems to be catching the same size fish. Maybe some of it stems from overfishing and guys not throwing back the bigger fish?? More guys fishing now than ever before and the fish not having a chance to get bigger?? Just throwing out some ideas.I'm not saying that decent size fish aren't out there, just the ratio of stunted fish to legal size fish is out of wack. I think that the PFBC needs to do better fish mgt. Our license fees keep going up every year, fines are handed out like crazy, yet they aren't managing the fish. Granted they do a decent job stocking trout, but how about other species? Seems like the PFBC forgets about everything but trout.