Please welcome Eyoyo Underwater Fishing Cameras.https://amzn.to/3siEgXn
ThomasthepikekillerDo you use Livescope? If Livescope wasn't a game changer, then professional fishermen (like Randy Blauket) wouldn't be in a major debate about it's use. They also wouldn't be spending thousands of dollars on units and winning major tournaments using FFS. A good example was the recent bass tournament at Lake Okeechobee. Where Scott Martin sat on a spot way longer than anyone would in the past because he could see out in front of his boat and see big bass. It's equal to sight fishing bass during spawn. If you can see fish then you are going to spend way more time trying different lures/baits and actions to catch those fish. I was out ice fishing this past weekend. I walked out among about 100 anglers. I drill a hole, put Livescope down and scan 100 feet 360 degrees. If I don't see any fish I move. As I search out fish I see other people not catching anything and waiting for fish to come to them. Within about 20 minutes and a few holes, I was on fish and caught many. As per usual, guys start moving towards me in hopes to get on same school. Sometimes disrespectfully close. Another example would be fishing in shallow water where traditional sonar would only be showing fish directly under transducer and approximately a cone 1/3 of water depth. That's a 3 feet cone area at very bottom and smaller as you get closer to the bottom of the ice. Where as with FFS I can scan the entire water column from bottom of lake to bottom of the ice for 100 feet or more. I can also tell which direction the fish are moving and with experience, what type, size and mood of fish. If this isn't a game changer than I don't know what is IMHO
If I had almost $7000 laying around, Id be buying a brand new Yamaha YZ250X.