Support Iceshanty... Get some great gear and forum goodies... Join The Iceshanty Hardwater Militia
Don't blame Lake trout,, Moosehead than Chesuncook follow a few years after Sebago's loss I Believe it was Acid fallout . I use to really enjoy jigging White off the State park it was a beautiful experience I also know of the loss of whitefish in Moosehead a few years later. Then a few years later Chesuncook and Caribou lost most of there Whitefish I and friends use to enjoy fishing for them in all three bodies of water.. In order to catch White fish we had to go north into the Allasgash . The fallout seemed to swing east after Chesuncook.
very sad that they are only found in a very small percentage of their range. they are slow growers that feed on the same stuff as smelt, which the biologists figured out when they tried to restore them to st. froid. the ones they put in there never got bigger than 15in. they are also sensitive to polution and temperature. we used to have round or river whitefish in soldier pond. we used to fish for them where the river dumps into the pond in april. they were a blast to catch and fine eating! sadly, no one has caught any in there for over 10 yrs. now the pond is full of y. perch and horn pout which until 10yrs ago didn't exist in there. I'm surprised the bios. even allow people to target them anymore.
Also on Eagle lake in the Allagash in the spring off one of the camp they were very active in the evenings we were there and catching them on a fly rod was a blast.
Pesticides, chemicals from runoff, acid rain, loss of spawning area, Global warming? Maybe a combo or all of the above.Humans
Is it worth it https://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2013/08/11/pestered-by-mosquitos-and-tics-ticking-you-off-a-mite-perhaps-thank-the-green-war-on-ddt/
Below is a pretty in-depth piece. It’s focal point over all is the effect on humans. I believe the biggest benefit of DDT regulation is the precautions established across the use of chemicals in the environment. It is worth noting, too, DDT is NOT banned for use against malaria and other vector Diptera subspecies. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2821864/
You don’t feel the biggest benefit/gain from DDT was saving human lives in the present when they were using it post WW2, but rather that humans began to perceive chemicals as potentially dangerous to our environment?
On FB Maine Ice Fishing someone wanted to know how to catch whitefish at Sebago. I know there are darn few left. Some blame the lake trout introduction. Somewhere I read something about smelt eating whitefish eggs. I do know there aren’t many left there. Anyway, I found this study done back in the 60’s and I’m putting a pic here of some I caught somewhere else, because we all like pictures. https://www.pwd.org/sites/default/files/the_sebago_lake_study.pdf(Image removed from quote.)
Overall, the benefits of regulations, largely beginning with DDT, likely saved many human lives.
Fair enough. I don’t agree with you, but I understand what you meant more clearly now. However, were as it may be “likely” that this approach has saved many human lives, it is not up for debate that DDT did save millions of lives when it was used post WW2.
Excessive gas into the air is a big cause of OUR Atmospherics problems. Sorry but I just had to say that!!!!!
It’s like: Fixing pollution with the Clean Water Act removing sewage, mercury and sulfuric acid for water ways and now stoping climate change to save species could be said saved millions of lives. What I mean is, by eliminating environmental invasive chemicals, we stop likely detriment. You COULD SAY it would have happened naturally, Right? Some would say, that after things are all good, we didn’t need to do anything. Well The clean water and air acts DID do something. Controlling pesticide and herbicide use is the same. Yep, if things are OK, we don’t really know, BUT, like Gassbladder said, Is it worth it? Imagine if we are wrong about climate change and end up with a better world, for instance. OMG!