Please welcome Eyoyo Underwater Fishing Cameras.https://amzn.to/3siEgXn
That is true. These formulas assume you know how to land a fish and tend your holes regularly so they dont freeze up. I personally have been using a 6in hole for years now without issue. Including the walleye you see in my avatar pic.
Thats cool but based on the size of your hands and long arming that walleye in your avatar is like 6lb.. 7 maybe. So that wouldnt be a huge deal to come thru a 6" hole.Id want a 7 or 8 if i knew i had a legitimate chance at a big pike or walleye
You got that right.Since 10-14+ pound walleyes are very common here, along with 10+ pound pike, monster lakers and 2 plus foot of ice, NOBODY I know of up in these waters relies on a six inch hole.If anybody is targeting those species listed above here, they're running an 8 or 10.
If you really want a big walleye, you'll make a 6" hole work, if that's all that you brought...<°)))>{
I can believe they came up the hole.......how the heck did you get the head turned and comming up it though?
Id want a 7 or 8 if i knew i had a legitimate chance at a big pike or walleye
Where is here?
Speaking of which, you hear about that 15.90 pound walleye that was caught here a few days ago?
So I went out ice fishing for the first time this past weekend and man was it a pain in the ass to use a 8" Eskimo hand auger through 7-9 inches of ice. I have always heard that the smaller the auger the easier it will be to use but was nervous if I get a huge pike I wouldn't be able to bring it up. Is it really that much of a difference to get a 6" auger or should I just suck it up and keep using a 8" auger?
I target mostly pan fish..i use only a 5 inch and have gotten 15 inch bass thru it withoutany real issue...I guess i'm old and the pan fish is all I need..lol