Please welcome Eyoyo Underwater Fishing Cameras.https://amzn.to/3siEgXn
I thought I heard somewhere that they were going brushless on the flx-12 and flx-20, but I cannot find any info to back that up. But anyway, here's a video comparing the different models...That's what I was curious about. They have a video up on their website with the flx 20 and 12 but it's the standard what's the right one for you. I am leaning heavily towards an 18, does everything I will ever need and is way less change!http://www.vexilar.com/pages/product-comparison
I thought I heard somewhere that they were going brushless on the flx-12 and flx-20, but I cannot find any info to back that up. But anyway, here's a video comparing the different models...http://www.vexilar.com/pages/product-comparison
Great explanation! I used a fl 20 with a guide in okoboji last winter and had a blast using a flasher with zoom. He took one look at my fl8 and said you are going to want this.... that being said once I figured out how to catch those light biting little perch there I had no problem the next day when all I had was my fl8. But fishing in 40 FOW it is a little more fun with zoom. Because of my geography I will most likely go with the fl 18, it does everything I need it to and the price is right. I plan to give the fl8 to my son, and use it for others when he doesn't want to go, he is 7 so he won't want to go all the time. Plus I kind of like being the guy who has all of the toys and gear.
I ended up going a different route and picked up a reconditioned unit directly from Vexilar- Same warranty as new with a fraction of the price. I was going to get a FL18, but for the money I decided to go to the FL22. I have never fished in more than 60' of water and figure that I have my old FL8 if I ever do. Seemed like a no-brainer a month ago... but now I see the FLX units!
I'm eager to try my fl22hd out this year too being the deepest ive ever fished in my 30 plus years icefishing was 39ft.but I'm not willing to let my flx28 collect dust,fl18 and 20 might tho.lol
Sportsman guide has the flx 20 pro pack at $494 for members. Makes it very tempting, an 18 would be plenty for me but I like the flat face and the brushless aspect of the flx20. The noise reduction would be nice, I just don't see the added value of the 28 when the 20 does almost everything and comes with the dd-100 that shows depth anyway. Decisions, decisions. Dual beam transducer would be nice but I can add that later. I wish ice would hurry up and get here though, this is shaping up to be an expensive off season.
Nailed it. FLX20 is all you need. It does everything the 28 will do.
....With the exception of auto-ranging... And the digital depth is displayed via the DD-100, not around the center bezel.
don't forget weed mode too..i thought the same thing about my vex fl20 can do everything that a flx28 can but was pretty impressed with the flx28 auto range and weed mode.and more levels of ir also.cant go wrong with either model tho.
auto is not all that important to me and the low power combined with the multiple color pallets can help you with weed mode as well. As far as having the digital depth it's not that big of a deal for me, all I care about is seeing fish and having decent target separation.
What I like about auto mode is you can get a 15ft range break vs being either 10 or 20 ft range. I find myself fishing in a lot of 12-15ft water and it lets a guy use the dial display fully vs having 5-8 ft of dead area on the display when being in the 20ft range.
I assume you are fishing IGL mostly, I also fish NW Iowa 90% of the time. I really find there is zero reason to ever take a Vexilar out of zoom. Other than the odd crappie suspended near Templar (even that is pretty rare to be above 6'), everything you're going to catch around here is going to be in the 6' zoom window, most of it 3' or less. My main FL-18 that I use most of the time will go all year around and never come out of zoom. Until you get to deeper stuff in SD, Northern MN, etc., you're not going to see fish outside of the zoom window and the range scale isn't relevant. That's one reason that I tell people when they ask to get a FL-18 bare minimum because it will do everything you need to catch as many fish as your ability allows. Anything above that is creature comfort with diminishing returns.
I fish the IGL maybe once or twice a year. I don't waste my time with those over rated lakes.
I'm with you on the Lakes being overrated, but the point remains if you're fishing anywhere around here. The bottom 6' is all you ever need.