Visit the Team Iceshanty Proshop
Chris, that is a 42". I'll pick up the 10" for testing and on ice adjusting. It'll be nice for the Lake Trout trips too.Guess I better get another Digger rack for the ATV.
Cant wait for next year on Lake Winnipeg, right now I have the 10" mora on my tanaka 350 it cuts good but the nils is a better quality.
Quote from: carcus1 on Apr 14, 2014, 06:45 AMCant wait for next year on Lake Winnipeg, right now I have the 10" mora on my tanaka 350 it cuts good but the nils is a better quality. Nobody sharpens them up here and they don't take well to our dirtier ice, they cut nice when they're sharp though.
After this winter, if I move up to this rig, I know I will want the matching 48" auger. ;-) Gotta love already having a built in extension.
Before you guys order a 48", please be aware that the collar/coupling on the Tanaka 350 is a good bit longer than the Tanaka 270 and most other augers. My 350 with a 42" auger puts the handles 58 inches off the ice. Here is a picture of the collar.
Nobody sharpens them up here and they don't take well to our dirtier ice, they cut nice when they're sharp though.Carcus before you posted I was thinking the same thing as Layne here. My old augers with the non-ripper/chipper style of blades used to need sharpening all the time from the sand/debris caught in the ice in Lake Winnipeg/Lake Manitoba, Red River, etc. or else they'd never cut worth a dang and these were good blades from Sweden. But the chipper style I have now, even when abused and hundreds of holes after a season still cut great.Do you find the nils can withstand a full season on the big waters around here, even with the debris we have?
I've never been a big fan of 10 inch holes. But, I did just get an 8 inch Nils with a Tanaka 350 Power head, so I may have to rethink this. I guess it would not hurt to have both.
Anyone seen these available anywhere?
What is the different turning rates between the 270 and 350's? That 350 looks mean. What does it weigh? Cost?MD